From Tree to Textile: Natural Fibers Used in Indian Tribal Crafts

Introduction

Long before factories mechanised fabric and global fashion reduced textiles to trends, India’s tribal communities understood fiber as a living extension of the natural world. Trees, grasses, animals, and plants were not merely resources to be extracted but companions in survival. In tribal societies, textiles emerged from forests, grazing lands, and riverbanks, shaped by seasonal rhythms and ecological limits. Every fiber carried knowledge—of climate, ritual, labour, and restraint. To trace natural fibers in Indian tribal crafts is to follow a journey where nature is not conquered but carefully negotiated.

Forests as Looms: Plant-Based Fibers

For many forest-dwelling communities, the forest itself functioned as a loom. Bark, leaf, and grass fibers were transformed into clothing, mats, ropes, and ceremonial textiles through techniques refined over generations. Bark fibers, often extracted from trees without felling them, required intimate knowledge of growth cycles. The inner bark was stripped, soaked, beaten, and twisted by hand, producing strong yet breathable fibers suitable for everyday wear.

Leaf fibers derived from banana stems, agave-like plants, and wild foliage were equally significant. These fibers demanded patience—retting in water, repeated drying, and hand-spinning before they could be woven. Grass and reed fibers, including bamboo and wild grasses, were used extensively by communities in central and eastern India to create mats, baskets, and coarse textiles. These materials were locally abundant and biodegradable, reinforcing a material culture that left minimal ecological scars.

Among Gond, Muria, and Bastar-region communities, such fibers were not seen as inferior substitutes for cotton but as textiles rooted in landscape identity. The tactile roughness of these fabrics mirrored forest life itself—durable, adaptive, and unpolished.

Plant-Based Fibers

Cotton Before the Mill: Indigenous Cotton Traditions

While cotton is often associated with large-scale agriculture and caste-based weaving systems, tribal cotton traditions followed a different trajectory. Indigenous varieties of desi cotton were cultivated on a small scale, hand-ginned, hand-spun, and woven for community use rather than commercial trade. These cottons had shorter staples but greater compatibility with natural dyes, making them ideal for earthy colour palettes.

Tribal cotton textiles were not uniform or mass-produced. Each stage—from spinning to weaving—carried visible irregularities that reflected the maker’s hand. Unlike mill cotton, which prioritised smoothness and speed, tribal cotton embodied slowness and individuality. Clothing made from such cotton often served multiple purposes: daily wear, ritual attire, and inheritance. In this context, cotton was not merely a fiber but a record of labour and lineage.

Tenun Ikat Lombok Traditional Sasak Village

Animal Fibers and Pastoral Life

In regions where forests gave way to grasslands and deserts, animal fibers shaped textile traditions. Pastoral communities depended on sheep, goats, and camels not only for mobility and sustenance but also for fiber. Wool was sheared seasonally, spun by hand, and woven into blankets, shawls, and garments designed to withstand harsh climates.

Camel hair, particularly in arid zones like Kutch, offered insulation against both heat and cold. Goat hair was often blended with sheep wool to enhance durability. These fibers were never extracted aggressively; animals were central to community survival, and their well-being determined the quality and quantity of fiber available. Textiles born from pastoral life thus embodied reciprocity rather than exploitation.

Handspun llama yarn from Patagonia

Processing the Fiber: Knowledge Beyond the Loom

The transformation of raw fiber into textile required a complex knowledge system extending far beyond weaving. Retting plant fibers without damaging them, carding wool using wooden tools, spinning yarn with hand-held spindles—each step demanded skill developed through observation and repetition. Tools were crafted from wood, bone, and stone, further embedding textiles within local ecologies.

This knowledge was often gendered but fluid. Women frequently controlled spinning and fiber preparation, while men handled weaving or loom construction, though many communities allowed overlap depending on need. Importantly, this division was not hierarchical but complementary. Fiber knowledge circulated orally, through demonstration rather than documentation, making it vulnerable to disruption yet remarkably resilient.

Ritual, Symbolism, and Sacred Fibers

Textiles in tribal societies extended beyond utility into ritual and symbolism. Certain fibers were reserved for ceremonial garments, initiation rites, or funerary practices. Trees and animals that supplied fibers were often considered sacred, governed by taboos regarding when and how extraction could occur. In some communities, textiles functioned as protective layers—wards against illness, misfortune, or malevolent forces.

Clothing thus became a spiritual interface between the body and the world. The act of wearing a fiber was also an act of alignment with nature, ancestors, and belief systems.

From Ecology to Economy: The Fragile Survival of Fiber Traditions

Today, these fiber traditions face multiple pressures. Forest access restrictions, climate change, and the availability of cheap industrial textiles have disrupted material continuity. While NGOs and designers have attempted revival through market integration, such interventions often prioritise aesthetics over ecological context.

True sustainability lies not in replicating tribal textiles for urban consumption but in supporting the conditions that allow communities to continue fiber practices on their own terms. When fiber knowledge disappears, it takes with it an entire worldview—one that understands limits, renewal, and respect for source.

Conclusion: Relearning Material Ethics from Tribal India

In an age obsessed with speed and scale, Indian tribal fiber traditions offer a radically different material ethic. From tree to textile, every step reflects patience, restraint, and accountability to nature. These fibers are not trends waiting to be rediscovered; they are living archives of ecological wisdom.

To engage with them meaningfully is to rethink how we value materials—not for perfection or profit, but for the relationships they sustain. Tribal textiles remind us that the future of sustainability may lie in remembering how fibers were once allowed to grow, breathe, and return to the earth.

• Jain, Jyotindra. Living Traditions: Folk Arts of India. Ahmedabad: Mapin Publishing, n.d.
  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321024458
• Roy, Tirthankar. “Traditional Textile Production and Indigenous Knowledge Systems in India.” Economic and Political Weekly, n.d.
  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262876543
• Chattopadhyay, Kamaladevi. Handicrafts of India. New Delhi: Indian Council for Cultural Relations, n.d.
  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307849112
• Singh, Kavita. “Material Culture, Ecology and Craft Knowledge in Tribal India.” Journal of South Asian Studies, n.d.
  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338774091
• Prasad, Lokesh. Textiles of Nomadic and Tribal Communities in India. Ahmedabad: Calico Museum of Textiles, n.d.
  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343112907
• Baviskar, Amita. “Forest-Based Livelihoods and Material Practices in Central India.” Contributions to Indian Sociology, n.d.
  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259927364